Skip to main content

Intruder - Pitchfork Attack

Purpose: The Pitchfork attack type allows you to test multiple parameters with different payloads simultaneously. It’s ideal for scenarios where you want to test how different combinations of inputs interact with each other.

How It Works:

  • Parallel Payload Insertion: In a Pitchfork attack, Burp Suite inserts different payloads from multiple lists into multiple positions. Each position gets its unique payload.

  • Combinatorial Testing: This method is effective when you suspect that specific combinations of inputs might trigger unique responses or vulnerabilities.

Steps:

1.Capture the Request:

  • Use Burp Suite’s Proxy tab to intercept the login request.

  • For example, the intercepted HTTP POST request might look like this :

                                       POST /example?p1=p1val&p2=p2val HTTP/1.0

                                       Cookie: c=cval

                                       Content-Length: 17

                                        p3=p3val&p4=p4val

2.Set the Positions:

  • Highlight both p3 and p4 parameters and set them as variable positions using "Add §".

  • The request will look like this in the Positions tab:



3.Configure Payloads:

  • In the Payloads tab, set the p3 field to use the first payload set (e.g., 123, 234,345).

  • Set the password field to use a second payload set (e.g., a,b,c).




4.Start the Attack:

  • Click "Start Attack" to begin the Pitchfork attack.

Result Analysis: Burp Suite will try each username with each corresponding password (i.e., first username with the first password, second username with the second password, etc.). Analyze the results to identify which combination, if any, leads to a successful login or triggers a different server behavior.



Conclusion: The Pitchfork attack is a powerful tool for testing combinations of different payloads across multiple parameters in parallel. It’s well-suited for situations where specific combinations of inputs might reveal vulnerabilities. By matching payloads from separate lists, the Pitchfork attack allows for a more targeted approach, making it useful for testing scenarios where the interaction between different parameters is crucial.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

OWASP Top 10 : Understanding Broken Access Control

What is broken access control? Broken access control is a security issue where users can access data or perform actions that they shouldn't be allowed to. This happens when the system fails to properly enforce rules about what users can and cannot do. Types of access controls :  1 . Vertical privilege escalation:  Vertical privilege escalation happens when a normal user gains access to functionalities reserved for higher-privileged users. Example:  A normal user can change the policies of the company.  2. Horizontal privilege escalation:  Horizontal privilege escalation allows a user to switch their access to another user's account, essentially impersonating them. Example:  A normal user can switch their account to admin.  3 . Insecure direct object reference ( IDOR):  IDOR occurs when an application exposes a reference to an internal implementation object, such as a file, directory, or database key. Example:  Suppose...

Intruder - Battering Ram Attack

Purpose:  The Battering Ram attack type is used when you need to insert the same payload into multiple positions within the same request. This can be useful in scenarios where multiple fields might share the same value or where you want to test how the application handles identical inputs across different parameters. How It Works: Multiple Position Synchronization:  In a Battering Ram attack, the same payload is simultaneously inserted into all the designated positions within the request. Synchronized Input Testing:  This type of attack is beneficial for testing inputs that are expected to be the same or related across different fields. Steps: 1.Capture the Request: Use Burp Suite’s Proxy tab to intercept the login request. For example, the intercepted HTTP POST request might look like this :                                       ...

OWASP Top 10 :Understanding Software and Data Integrity Failures

   What are Software and Data Integrity Failures? Software and Data Integrity Failures refer to issues that compromise the accuracy, consistency, and trustworthiness of software and data. These failures can result from various factors, including malicious attacks, software bugs, or misconfigurations. Key Types of Software and Data Integrity Failures: 1. Input Validation Failures : Occur when the software does not properly validate input data. Examples : Buffer overflows, SQL injection, and cross-site scripting (XSS). 2. Authentication and Authorization Failures : Occur when there are weaknesses in verifying user identities or controlling user permissions. Examples : Broken authentication mechanisms, and improper access controls. 3. Cryptographic Failures : Involve weaknesses or misconfigurations in cryptographic mechanisms. Examples : Use of weak encryption algorithms, and improper key management. 4. Configuration and Deployment Failures : Arise from incorrect software or...